IELTS · Rehberler · 30 Ekim 2026 · 6 dk okuma

IELTS essay örnekleri: 3 farklı soru tipinde 7.0 düzeyinde Writing Task 2 cevabı

Bu sayfada üç farklı Task 2 soru tipinde tam essay örnekleri var: görüş (opinion), sorun-çözüm (problem-solution) ve iki soruluk (two-part question). Her biri yaklaşık 7.0 düzeyini hedefliyor: hatasız değil, ama net bir pozisyon, mantıklı paragraflar, doğal kelime seçimi ve çeşitli dilbilgisi yapıları var. Her örneğin altında neden işe yaradığını ve Türk adayların aynı soruda tipik olarak nerede puan kaybettiğini yazdık.

Task 2’nin genel yapısı ve “discuss both views” tipinde bir örnek için önce IELTS Writing Task 2 yazısına bak.

1. Opinion (agree / disagree)

Some people believe that working from home is better for both employees and companies. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Since the pandemic, millions of office workers have discovered that they can do their jobs from their kitchen tables. While remote work clearly has advantages, I only partly agree that it is better for both employees and employers, because its benefits depend heavily on the type of job.

For employees, the most obvious gain is time. A worker in Istanbul can easily spend two or three hours a day commuting, and working from home turns that time into rest, exercise or family life. Companies may benefit as well, since they can reduce the cost of renting large offices and hire talented people who live in other cities.

However, these advantages are not universal. Young employees in particular often learn by watching experienced colleagues, asking quick questions and joining informal conversations, none of which happens naturally on a video call. Teams that need to solve complex problems together may also find that ideas develop more slowly online. In such cases, remote work can harm both the individual’s career and the company’s performance.

For this reason, I believe a hybrid model is the most sensible approach. Employees could work from home on days devoted to focused, individual tasks and come to the office for meetings, training and teamwork.

In conclusion, working from home is not automatically better for everyone. It works well for independent tasks, but companies should keep some time in the office so that collaboration and learning do not suffer.

Neden işe yarıyor? Pozisyon (only partly agree) girişte netleşiyor ve sonuçta aynı kalıyor. “Partly” diyen aday iki tarafı da anlatmak zorunda; bu essay bunu ayrı paragraflarla yapıyor. Örnek (İstanbul’da gidiş-dönüş) genel ve inandırıcı.

Türk adayların tipik versiyonu: I am agree with this opinion. → I agree. Agree bir fiil, be gerekmiyor. Ayrıca In nowadays → Nowadays ya da These days.

2. Problem-solution

In many cities, the number of cars on the roads is increasing, causing traffic problems. What are the causes of this problem, and what measures can be taken to solve it?

Traffic congestion has become a daily reality in most large cities, from Ankara to Bangkok. This essay will argue that the main causes are poor public transport and the way cities are planned, and that the solution lies in making alternatives to the car more attractive.

The first cause is that public transport often fails to meet people’s needs. When buses are crowded, metro lines do not reach new neighbourhoods and journeys require several changes, many commuters feel they have no choice but to drive. A second reason is urban sprawl. As cities expand outwards with large residential areas far from workplaces and shops, daily distances grow, and the car becomes the only practical option.

To tackle the problem, governments should invest first in fast and reliable public transport. Dedicated bus lanes, for example, can be introduced quickly and cheaply, and they make buses faster than private cars during rush hour. In the longer term, new housing should be built close to metro and rail lines, so that residents do not need a car for every trip. Finally, some cities have successfully reduced traffic by charging drivers to enter the centre at peak times, as London has done since 2003.

In conclusion, traffic jams are largely the result of weak public transport and car-dependent planning. Better transport networks, smarter planning and, where necessary, congestion charges would offer people a real alternative to driving.

Neden işe yarıyor? Soru iki şey soruyor (neden + çözüm) ve essay ikisine eşit ağırlık veriyor. Her çözüm bir nedenle eşleşiyor: zayıf toplu taşıma → otobüs şeritleri; şehrin yayılması → raylı sisteme yakın konut. Bu eşleşme Coherence puanını yükseltiyor.

Türk adayların tipik versiyonu: Government must make more metro. → The government should build more metro lines. (the government için artikel, make yerine doğru fiil, metro sayılabilir bir ağ değil; metro lines.)

3. Two-part question

Many people today are unhappy despite having more money than previous generations. Why is this the case? What can people do to be happier?

Although average incomes in many countries are higher than they were fifty years ago, surveys suggest that people are not noticeably happier. In my view, this is mainly because of constant comparison with others and a lack of time, and the most effective response is to focus on relationships rather than possessions.

One reason for this paradox is social media. People now compare their ordinary lives with carefully selected images of friends’ holidays, cars and celebrations, so even a comfortable lifestyle can feel inadequate. Another reason is that higher incomes often come with longer working hours. Many professionals earn more than their parents did, but they have less time to spend with family or simply to rest.

There are, however, practical steps people can take. Research on well-being consistently shows that close relationships matter more than material wealth, so spending time with friends and family is likely to have a greater effect than buying a new phone. Limiting time on social media can also reduce the habit of comparison. Finally, people who choose experiences, such as travel or learning a skill, instead of objects, tend to report longer-lasting satisfaction.

To sum up, greater wealth has not led to greater happiness largely because of comparison and overwork. People are more likely to feel content if they invest their time in relationships and experiences rather than in possessions.

Neden işe yarıyor? İki soru var ve girişte ikisine de kısa cevap veriliyor. Her soru ayrı bir gövde paragrafında. Kelime seçimi doğal ve konuya özel: paradox, inadequate, well-being, longer-lasting satisfaction.

Türk adayların tipik versiyonu: People has more money but they are not happy because they always compare theirselves. → People have (people çoğul), themselves. Ayrıca “çünkü” ile başlayan uzun Türkçe cümle yapısını İngilizceye aktarmak yerine iki kısa cümle kur.

Örneklerden çıkarılacak beş ders

1. Pozisyonu girişte yaz ve değiştirme. Opinion sorularında belirsizlik Task Response puanını düşürür.
2. Her gövde paragrafı tek fikir. Fikir, açıklama, örnek.
3. Ezber kalıplar yerine soruya özel kelimeler. In today’s modern world gibi kalıplar puan getirmez.
4. 250–300 kelime yeterli. Daha uzun yazmak hata sayısını artırır.
5. Son beş dakikayı kontrol için ayır: artikel, -s ekleri, people/is uyumu.

Bağlaçları doğal kullanmak için IELTS linking words, puanın nasıl verildiğini görmek için IELTS değerlendirme kriterleri.

Kendi essay’ini yaz

Örnekleri okumak tek başına yetmez; aynı soruya kendi cevabını yaz ve karşılaştır. Nomto’nun Task 2 pratiğinde bu tiplerde sorular var: uzaktan çalışma, trafik, mutluluk, okulda telefon. Metnin dört resmi kritere göre değerlendirilir ve düzeltilmesi gereken cümleler gösterilir.

Diğer diller: Oʻzbekcha, العربية, Bahasa Indonesia, Português (Brasil), English, Español, Русский